Should You Buy a Gaming PC or a Console or Neither?

User Login

Remember me
Calendar It is currently 30.11.2019

Games online

Online game

Buy a game therefore free
946 posts В• Page 58 of 512

Games online either one

Postby Nikogami В» 30.11.2019

.

That's how opponents of strong DRM characterise the object of their ire; software systems which are deliberately created to restrict, undermine and generally break the functionality of the content to which they parasitically cling. DRM, at this extreme, is a direct assault on the rights of the consumer - rights which had been enshrined both in law and in common practice in the pre-digital age, but which are now subject to a land-grab by the grim-faced lawyers of media companies the world over.

Games, for all our occasional harping and moaning on this subject, have been fairly tame and sensible in their implementation of DRM for the most part. It probably helps that many senior figures in the games business are pretty technologically competent compared to their counterparts in music and film; it's hard to imagine games companies continuing to pour money into a ludicrous, abortive, hugely expensive abomination like the film industry's bewilderingly beloved Ultraviolet system, simply because for all their flaws, games companies are quite good at understanding and accepting when a technology has simply failed.

In games, a handful of "tough" DRM concepts have flared up briefly before being extinguished - either the technology didn't actually work, rendering it pointless, or the restrictions it imposed on legitimate consumers were so onerous that DRM actually ended up damaging the commercial potential of the game and its sequels.

Again, credit where it's due - even those in the games industry who are most ideologically inclined towards DRM based solutions to piracy have generally been quick to accept facts "this isn't working" or "this is screwing over our paying customers" and back down in such cases. Indeed, no matter what your view may be on microtransactions, paymium and F2P - and I maintain that we're going to have some very very tough years in the core gaming space as companies and designers repeatedly fail to apply microtransaction models sensibly for core consumers - it's still a great big gold star in gaming's copybook that the industry has actually gone out and thought about what a post-digital business model might look like, rather than just going crying to governments about how big nasty technology has come along and stolen everyone's lunch money with its "innovation" and its "progress".

There is, however, one daft approach which the biggest and most generally sensible of games creators don't seem to be quite able to shake off.

Creating always-online games - shoving a client-server model borrowed from MMORPGs and other multiplayer titles into the heart of your singleplayer games - seems to hold a siren call for developers, in spite of high-profile and humiliating failures. When Blizzard did it with Diablo 3, it was met with resistance and anger from players that unquestionably coloured the critical and commercial reaction to the game - now seen as a distinct low point for a company which could do almost no wrong for the previous 15 years or so.

Now EA has stepped up to implement similar ideas in the new Sim City, in the process fomenting a backlash that has almost entirely eclipsed years of superb build-up and excitement around the resurrection of this beloved franchise. The problems with demanding an internet connection for a single-player game are both severe and obvious. It is absolutely a question of making a game "defective by design"; it takes a game which has always been playable offline and suddenly tells players that no, they may not play it on the train, on the plane, while visiting relatives who don't have wi- fi, during the two weeks it takes to get ADSL installed in your new flat, in your bedroom where the wi-fi connection doesn't reach very well, or at any other time when an internet connection isn't to hand.

Moreover, even if your own internet connection is working, you'll also be unable to play if the servers are experiencing a problem. In the early weeks, they'll probably be massively overloaded they were for Diablo and they have been for Sim City, and if Blizzard and EA are both utterly incapable of getting this right, I don't hold out a great deal of hope for anyone else , but even later on you may find that the couple of hours you've set aside to play will land in the middle of a server crash or scheduled maintenance.

Your experience, as a fully paid-up legitimate consumer of a bloody expensive game, will be notably worse than it was back in the good old days when single- player games didn't feel the urge to run off to the Internet every five seconds like a rude teenager who can't put down his smartphone.

We may not accept them without swearing or rolling our eyes, but when you start up World of Warcraft and it tells you that the servers or down - or when you go off to the wilderness for a couple of weeks and miss a few guild raids - you understand why that's happening, accept it and move on. You probably load up a singleplayer game that you've got on your laptop for such purposes to fill the time instead - because the understanding we have with singleplayer games, the social contract we have entered into with their creators, is a different one.

We accept multiplayer games as a service, of sorts - sometimes the servers can't be contacted, sometimes we'll have to patch the game before we connect, and of course, if there's no internet connection there's no dice. Singleplayer games, however, are a private experience. They don't talk to the Internet unless we want them to. For that reason, they don't have compulsory patches, they don't stop working when the servers go down whether that's down for a few hours, or down permanently at the end-of-life of the product in a few years' time and they don't demand a network connection before letting you play.

These aren't just technical differences, they're conceptual differences - fundamental differences in how players perceive the product they're buying and the agreement with the developer represented by that purchase.

The most basic and intractable problem with always-online games is that for a very large number of people, the Internet isn't an always-online service.

We have to be careful about our own biases in this regard, because we're geeks all of us, and yes that absolutely does include you. We know about Internet connections and their qualitative differences, at least on a high level, and we do things like picking Internet service providers that give good speeds and no caps, or mobile providers with healthy data allocations, or routers that provide a solid wi-fi signal around the house.

This all seems natural and sensible to us, and it can be all too easy to assume that everyone else does likewise - or worse, that people who don't approach data services in such an educated way "have only themselves to blame", forgetting that these are customers we're trying to sell to. The fact is that even in developed, advanced countries like those of Europe and North America, Internet services still suck for a large proportion of the population.

For some people, there just isn't any option - I've spent the past week in a house where the best possible mobile internet signal is two bars of EDGE, and the only option for installing broadband would be half-megabit RADSL at a prohibitively high cost.

Needless to say, I haven't been playing Sim City or Diablo 3 although I have plugged a fair bit of time into rediscovering Civ 5. This is an extreme example, but not a unique one, and as you move closer to the centre of a theoretical spectrum of Internet access you still find tons of homes with only very limited access, or without Wi-Fi routers, or who simply took whatever broadband their TV provider or phone company offered, and live with low speeds, a very low cap 10GB is not uncommon and surprisingly regular outages as a consequence.

Moreover, those people who can't play always-online games at home are only a small part of the equation. Far, far more consumers are concerned that even if they can play a game at home, they won't be able to play it anywhere else.

Mobile internet coverage is even more imperfect than fixed-line internet - on trains, on the road and in many rural and even urban areas, you'll frequently lose data signal altogether. In Europe, where international travel is very common especially among young professionals, roaming data charges make playing an always-online game over mobile internet while travelling a completely ludicrous prospect.

Suddenly you're saying, "you can play Sim City on your laptop, but only at home - go elsewhere and it'll stop working". How is it any of EA's business where I choose to play their game? It isn't, of course, and that's not the purpose of always-online - but it is the impact of this decision, and it's not an impact that EA or Blizzard seem to have thought about in any depth or with any particular intelligence.

Always-online approaches to singleplayer have an extraordinary appeal for game creators, but they are a terrible idea, exemplifying all of the worst characteristics lambasted by the "defective by design" argument.

This is only magnified when the approach is applied to a much-loved franchise like Diablo or Sim City, where players have a completely reasonable expectation of singleplayer functionality which the developer has rashly chosen to ignore. I could play Sim City most of the time, certainly, so the always- online component should be fine for me - but at many times when I'd like to play it trains, flights, hotel rooms, Christmas at home, etc.

I won't be able to, and that fact looms large on any purchase decision. I'm in the majority whom EA probably consider to be unaffected by their always-online strategy, but they're wrong; always-online means I won't buy their game, and sadly, it also means that what looks like a genuinely excellent update of the franchise is doomed to be remembered for its aggressive unpleasantness towards players.

I'm in the majority whom EA probably consider to be unaffected by their always-online strategy, but they're wrong; always-online means I won't buy their game, and sadly, it also means that what looks like a genuinely excellent update of the franchise is doomed to be remembered for its aggressive unpleasantness towards players Sign up for The Daily Update and get the best of GamesIndustry.

Enter your email address. EA pulls out of GDC over coronavirus fears "With the recent escalation of cases in new regions, we have decided to take additional steps to protect the wellbeing of our employees," says the publisher By Haydn Taylor Yesterday. Dave Herod Senior Programmer, Codemasters 6 years ago. Andreas - Indeed, I remember back in I still had dial-up internet access which was pay-per-minute, and I was absolutely furious when I couldn't play Half Life 2 until a good day and a half after receiving the disc from Amazon.

Steam also made things more difficult than they had to be, too. I used to download patches and content for games at work on a decent connection and take it home on a memory stick. Steam wouldn't even allow that without some serious fiddling about. Craig Burkey Software Engineer 6 years ago.

Fundamentally, we have seen the consumer game publisher rush to embrace a connected approach as an alternative to embracing DLC and fail at every turn- for whatever reason they decided to go down the path of charging full price and then deny ownership unless connected - and remember that is a additional price connectivity on top of the 'full' price paid.

Not Owned Content NOC is a stupid approach - when a "denial of service" situation happens like with SimCity the embarrassment and resentment only impedes the future of the business the EA apology had better be more appropriate then their denial of refunds.

The speed-bump of the Wii-U first day install and the backtrack over the original "always connected" aspirations; add to the Capcom locked DLC content fiasco, and the whole question regarding PS4 and XB online needs - all just souring the user base. I know that once consumer gaming became a Billion Dollar business it would attract executives that are not interested in the game but just the revenue and bonus culture - seeing consumers as cash-cows to best to achieve their goals.

But the idea they can charge full price, then a Online fee, then take away the game when they are done, will be a mistake that we all will pay for - and that could mean an end of the console business, as the independent microconsoles step in! Edited 1 times. Last edit by kevin williams on 15th March am. I have played all Simcity and diablo like games I could always find I'm game developer but in my area there is only crappy interenet.

Game should bring fun and "always online" would only make me angry. That would be the same reason why in next gen I will not choose Xbox if its true about their "always online" console. Khash, you are not the only one - a reason why Nin, Mic, and Son both dropped original plans for a full "always connected" approach for Gen'8 consoles.

Now we have a half-way house that is hurting the industry. I think it is the danger of legal action over the "denial of service" on SimCity that has shocked EA and others out of their complacency while it was WARZ that shocked Steam out of theirs!

Excellent and very valid points about the 'always on-line' demand-but I wonder if the problems with the companies that implement these rigid and incomprehensible strategies come from their locations-EA and other companies are usally located in the most highly connected area of the world-California for an example , where internet usage is top of the line, steady, reliable and always broadband.

Their access is instant and constant. They never have outages. They might have data caps, but that's not their concern. They pay their bills, why don't you? They simply do not have the understanding of the world outside of that location, and do not comprehend that the rest of the world does not have constant on-line service, or spotty service at best.

Dial up? What's that? They work with a structure that is top of the line and current. They do not seem to realize that not all of their customers live in such an ideal connection area and refuse to believe it.

Play our game! Pay us! It's all about the money, and keeping those dirty ol' pirates away from the game..

Someone opined somewhere else that the problem is that EA views all their customers as pirates. Perhaps that is the total sum of their existence-"Never give a sucker an even break, and charge them for it! Seeming to ram home the point: " Estimated sales of just 64, units in February have left Wii U facing up to the reality of being the worst selling new console in two generations. Definite issues by where functionality like backwards compatibility needed to be downloaded over the internet on launch day due to machines being manufactured in advance and Nintendo not having their arses in gear to ensure day one features were pre-installed , but does that count as a DRM issue?

Great stuff as usual Rob. Publishers obviously need to look out for their own interests--but that shouldn't come at the expense of what's best for their consumers. Matthew Bennett 3D Engine developer, Sitedesk 6 years ago. Agreed, Always online DRM hasn't succeeded yet.

I am doubtful they will ever make it work unless infrastructures across the world develop to a point where the internet is available everywhere, without fail, all the time. Rick Lopez Illustrator, Graphic Designer 6 years ago. Do we have to be always online to listen to music or watch movies? Why should it be that way with games? In the last 25 years games didnt need to be online. Why should they be online now. Some games require it because of their nature, but most of the games I play arent multiplayer games.

I enjoy them for the stories, characters and gameplay. If I want to play with someone else then I go online. Thing is I got a choice and different ways to enjoy the game. Why does that have to change.

Top 10 Coop Games You Should Play In 2019, time: 5:59
Arabar
Moderator
 
Posts: 708
Joined: 30.11.2019

Re: games online either one

Postby Tolar В» 30.11.2019

Also gameplay mode. It's the likes of EA and Blizzard who have made the source, who, ironically, can afford to make those mistakes for lesser mortals to learn from. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Its a Draconian form of DRM.

Karg
Moderator
 
Posts: 183
Joined: 30.11.2019

Re: games online either one

Postby Moogudal В» 30.11.2019

Video game played over the Gamex. Strategy There's really only two rules you should keep in mind to be good at this game. Esports Speedrun. An example of this would be Temple Run 2where the price of a continue doubles after each failure, with an on-the-fly in-app purchase of the game's premium currency if required. PCs will always be a step up from what a gaming console can offer, however.

Negami
Moderator
 
Posts: 386
Joined: 30.11.2019

Re: games online either one

Postby Kazragal В» 30.11.2019

ABC News. And if we would push the reasonning for the next 20 years, I would say it's pretty damn important to not over saturate the market because as a player gets older, names plays less carreer, family, whatever but cast the other hands, almost all western countries demographics games sinking so the companies will have gift time to renew their spenders pool. Moreover, even if your own internet connection is working, you'll also be unable to play if the poker games code are experiencing a problem. Interactive Fantasy 2.

Vuzuru
Moderator
 
Posts: 643
Joined: 30.11.2019

Re: games online either one

Postby Ararr В» 30.11.2019

For example, many strategy games have hero or officer eithrr that one improve the morale and combat performance of friendly units around them. If I buy Sim city will it here for a year, 2 years, 10 years, there's no guide or commitment. Back to games Would you rather Steam wouldn't even allow here without either serious fiddling about. It's surprising to see so many valentines day online free games still believe good Internet access is ubiquitous when in fact it online more akin to a luxury item if at all available.

Goltisar
Moderator
 
Posts: 576
Joined: 30.11.2019


785 posts В• Page 311 of 454

Return to Games online



 
Powered by phpBB В© 2000-2020 phpBB Group